verdict for extreme cases, and most of there verdicts have
had an tinct on the way we (Law Enforcement) do business
immediately. A swell example of how Supreme Court decisions affect
the way we (Law Enforcement) do business today would be
Miranda vs. genus Arizona. This case created what we know today to
be the Miranda rights
In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona for stealing $8 from bank worker and charged with armed robbery. He already had a character for armed robbery, and a juvenile record including attempted rape, assault, and burglary. While in police custody he signed a written excuse to the robbery, and to grab and raping an 18-year-old cleaning woman 11 days before the robbery. After the time, his lawyers appealed, on the causa that Miranda did not know he was protected from self-incrimination. Miranda was convicted of rape and kidnapping and sentenced to 20 to 30 years on both charges. Mirandas lawyer, Alvin Moore, appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court solely the charges were upheld.
Chief Justice rabbit warren, a former prosecutor, delivered
the opinion of the Court, ruling that due to the coercive
reputation of custodial interrogation by police (to add to his
point, Warren controversially cited several police
training manuals), no confession could be admissible under
the Fifth Amendment self-incrimination clause and 6th
Amendment right to an attorney unless a suspect had been
made aware(predicate) of his rights and the suspect had then waived
them. As a result Mirandas conviction was overturned.
Miranda was retried, and this time the police did not
use the confession but called witnesses and used other
evidence. Miranda was convicted, and served 11 years.
Following the Miranda decision, the nations police
departments were required to inform arrested persons of
their rights under the ruling, termed a Miranda...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment