Setting Up A Moral System Essay Example for Free

Setting Up A Moral System canvasThe inst bothation of a object lesson corpse is vital in every society. Yet, every moral system must deal with the major betrothaling general moral step ups Consequentialism versus Non-consequentialism Self versus Other-Interestedness Act Utilitarianism versus Rule Utilitarianism and emotion versus reason. When all four knowledge domains are combined and examined there are conflicting views that must be proposed. prototypic of all, there is the rationalise of Consequentialism and Non-consequentialism. Consequentialism is best exposit by utilitarianism, where conclusions are based on the consequences of the import of the decision made. On the other hand, non-consequentialism is best described as an ethical theory that is based not on the consequences of the action, but on some higher moral standard that is placed upon them. Examples of non-consequentialism are Kants Duty ethics and Divine Command Theory. The conflict between the two i s whether to do what is best according to the outcome or company what one feels as the higher moral standard would require them to adhere to. Personally, I would resolve this area by choosing the consequentialist belief as my tool for judgement because I feel that large number fate to think astir(predicate) the consequences of their actions because if they dont then it will cause havoc in the society.Thus, I feel that consequentialism is the prissy solution in this area. Secondly, there is the conflict between Self versus Other-Interestedness. The concept of self is best described as being selfish and only caring some oneself without worrying about what might go on to others. While the concept of other-interestedness is basically putting the needs of everyone else over your own (this is similar to utilitarianism). The big conflict is that most people are going to choose themselves first, but if this were a perfect society the people would worry about everyone first. If people would think about it, then they figure it out that they are include in everyone. Therefore, in this area I would solve the problem by choosing the theory of other-interestedness. Next, there is the issue of the act utilitarianism versus the rule utilitarianism. The act approach to utilitarianism is that a person should perform acts that will bring about the greatest good for the greatest number.On the other hand, the rule approach to utilitarianism is that people establish and follow rules which will bring about the greatest good for the greatest number. The major conflicting moral issue is whether or not there is freedom involved in the decision making process. Act utilitarianism break-dances outright freedom, while rule utilitarianism gives virtually no freedom, but rule utilitarianism gives structure and stability to the society. The best means to solve this area would be to have rule utilitarianism and act utilitarianism combined so that you have rules to give some structure to society but have the ability for the people to be allowed to express their soulfulness freedoms in the society.Thus, I feel that a combination of the two is the best way solve this area of the moral system. Finally, there is the issue between reason and emotion. Reason is described as thinking about what the outcome of the decision would be, then making the decision. The theory of emotion is reacting to ones emotions without thinking about the possible outcome of the situation. In this situation one has to side with reason because if not the society would have people reacting to their emotions all the time which could chaos and would not fit into a utopian society. All of these four areas combined would dish in establish an upright and proper moral system when applied correctly. I feel that the decisions that I made earlier in this essay are the proper ones needed for a good moral system.