Twelve Angry Men :: Essays Papers

Twelve Angry MenIn the narration Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose shows how making whizzs owndecisions is one very important aspect in life. He also showed that ones decisions should non be impeded by stereotypes. I believe that the jury reached the indemnify verdict because the witnesses were disproven along with all of the evidence.The first reason is that the witnesses were proven to be wrong. For example,there was an el train passing by the old mans window at the time of the massacre. Hecouldnt have been able to hear the murder taking place. The old man was not as much ofa reliable source as he was originally thought to be. In addition, the woman that livedacross the street from the boy did not wear her render to bed the night of the murder. She couldnt have been able to know for a concomitant that the boy was the real murderer. Thewomans testimony is not strong enough to condemn the boy to death. With the two keywitnesses having been discredited, the case against the boy was very weak.The separate reason is that the evidence was proven to be not as earthshaking as it was once thought to be. For example, juror Eight bought a spit exactly like the one used in the murder. The original lingua was not as special or unique as it was portray to be in the trial. Any person could have bought a knife just like the original one and used it to murder the father. Furthermore, Juror Two said that he thought that the stab wound was in like manner high up for the boy to have inflicted. Someone taller than the boy must(prenominal) have committed the murder. With the new ideas that are being brought up by the jurors, the boy seems to become a less likely suspect.