The author starts off with her argument that, the economic crisis has not spurred intergenerational cleavages, and that she does not find a lot of evidence that it is increasing (Campbell 554). To hold in her argument, she looks back at the history. Writings during the 1980s suggested that conflict between these groups of people would erupt but data during this time and slightly later on says this never came about. In fact, despite the fact that the young may not vex benefits in the future, they did not have strong feelings about cutting off the elderly.
Andrea Campbells modern data suggests that run on for common elderly programs were still high.
Younger people were actually more supportive of reducing the Medicare prescription drug scatter than older people. Also, most Americans said they did not mind salaried taxes that benefit the elderly because one day they would also receive benefits. There is a majority push to preserve companionable Security for upcoming generations. Therefore, the attitudes of the past and the current attitudes matched each separate quite closely.
The author then explains why there is not much conflict between young people and old people. The first explanation is that there could be ignorance involved in current policy. However, she does not believe that ignorance is the only factor. Such programs give young...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment