The speaker asserts that innovations such as videos, computers, and the net too lots distract from real teaching in the dassroom. I strongly agree that these tools underside be counterproductive in some(a) instances, and ineffectual for certain types of acquire. Nevertheless, the speakers assertion places too little mensurate on the federal agencys in which these innovations can facilitate the learning process.
In several respects, I find the statement compelling. front of all, in my observation and experience, computers and videos atomic number 18 misused most oft for education when teachers rely on them as surrogates, or baby-sitters. Teachers mustiness use the time during which students are watching videos or are at their computer stations productively--helping other students, preparing lesson plans, and so forth. Otherwise, these tools can indeed impede the learning process.
Secondly, passive viewing of videos or of Web pages is no indication that any significant learning is taking place. Thus teachers must care effectivey select Internet resources that provide a true interactive learning experience, or are highly informative otherwise.
And, in selecting videos teachers must be sure to follow up with lively class discussions. Otherwise, the relatively passive nature of these media can render them ineffectual in the learning process.
Thirdly, some types of learning occur best during face to face skirmishs between teacher and student, and between students. Only by way of a live encounter can a lecture teacher recognize and immediately correct subtle problems in pronunciauon and inflection. And, there
is no suitable substitute for a live encounter when it comes to teaching techniques in painting,If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment