The Souths money was based off cotton and tobacco. Cotton was the most profitable. A machine was invented to speed up the time. Thus, meaning they ask cheap laborers to make vastger profit. On the other hand, the wedlocks economy was more industrial based. They got help from modernistic England. It gave them room to advance. The due north was doing great while the South was incisively getting bad by the moment.
Slavery was a big part of the South. They needed the slaves for labor. The North, however, didnt cast any utilization for slaves. Both sides would agree; Sydney E. Ahlstrome says Had there been no slavery, there would have been no war.(Qtd. In Leidner).On twain sides it was
a symbolic point. flat though most Southerners didnt own slaves they thought it was a way for the North to destroy their culture. Northerners saw it as a way for the south to influence national policy. Most of it was on the political background.
Most people either had never seen a slave or owned one, it was mostly the politicians.
Souths political leaders didnt want to get relinquish of slaves because they thought they would lose profit. The North was split. They were both against slavery and for it. exclusively still the North precious to stabilize it from spreading. The North had an interestingness in limiting the spread of slavery into the new territories for both purposes of controlling southern political power and support of the moral issue.(Gordon Leidner). Most people wanted to avoid civil war. However, fire-eaters wanted to make war to guarantee the right to own slaves. The North side was willing to make war to end the right of slavery. So at that, leaders convinced the people to go to war, but they really didnt tell them it was for slavery. The South verbalize it was for their way of life. The North...If you want to get a full essay, post it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment