The Next Culture of Democracy

2). Indeed, Schuler contends that throughout history a nonher(prenominal) new forms of colloquy analogous radio, TV, and others were repugnwed in a uniform manner as the earnings. However, in turn, each of these new forms of communication is maintained and controlled, both in access and content, by powerful, sozzled groups that control society.

The conflict theory of social problems maintains that social issues like poverty, prejudice, and political disenfranchisement arise from competing interests of different social groups as they vie for resources. The media, aside from the network, is currently owned, manipulated, and controlled by a handful of cockeyed interests who perpetuate the values, norms, and beliefs that insure their own interests through the media. FOX intelligence reading primarily became a supporter of President Bush in his reelection bid, as opposed to an unbiased source of critical information for voters to help in political decision-making. Schuler (p. 2) warns that those who view the net profit as being able to transcend this process may not recognize the future of the Internet may be quite an similar to other current forms of communications media, "There is a large number of powerful and resource-rich institutions that are banking on the hatchway that the Internet will repay their investments handily. We may learn in time that the investments that provide the largest returns to inve

piece there are limitations in Schuler's (p. 2) mind that the Internet offers a panacea for what ails contemporary democracy and civic culture, the author is not opposed to its potential to enhance such processes, "All this is not to dismiss the democratic potential of the Internet." Certainly the 2000 presidential elementary campaigns offered insight into the potential of the Internet to do exactly this. possibly the greatest impact of the Internet in civic companionship and democracy is its ability to link inexpensively individuals from all socioeconomic classes and backgrounds, individuals who typically are marginalized with respect to having a voice in public policy and political campaign decisions.

As was discernable from the enormously achieverful grassroots Internet campaign of Howard Dean, the Internet has shifted the structure of American politics from a top-down, centralized trope to one that is organized from the bottom-up and decentralized. As Mack (p. 18) says of Howard Dean's success, " everywhere seven months, Dean raised more money than whatsoever(prenominal) democratic outlook for president in history, $40 million. Hnward Dean, a nobody from nowhere with no chance, used the Internet to fundamentally in the course of seven months to become the leading candidate of the Democratic Party for president."

stors might not be the selfsame(prenominal) as those that are the best investments for cultivating civic culture."

Such success stories are part of the reason why Schuler maintains that many viewed the Internet as a dashing hero that will reawaken the principles of democracy and civic participation in American society. Nevertheless, such a view is misguided by the notion that the Internet is unlike other forms of communications or social institutions, something insubordinate to powerful interest group control. We see Schuler (p. 3) provides us with a definition of "organic intellectuals," an individual that is considered an "expert" in some field or area that is usually hired by an institution, t
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!